🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy was effective, and disclosed new appeals had originated from go-betweens to reopen negotiations with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Route

Araghchi is navigating a complex route since Iran does not want be seen to be acting from a situation of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger defensively and emotionally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material within its borders that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Negotiations Unexpectedly Ended

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that concluded with the US president asserting the facilities had been eliminated. Subsequently, EU nations used their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with US participation could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Representatives stated three times they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the agreement to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Present Situation

Tehran representatives declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be revived in certain ways if discussions reopen.

The US president last week said he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to restart talks, but privately Iranian officials say they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from America either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of inactivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Political Standpoint

In his speech to the conference, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the notion of international law, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict revealed the dispute could not be ended by military means. He said the assaults commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with full US knowledge and collaboration, making confidence difficult to restore.

Negotiations Stays the Primary Resolution

The foreign minister stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled negotiations; it was America and the European states that had always sought to enforce their desires during the talks. Diplomacy can still be alive and remains the primary answer to address disagreements, but its requirements, rules and principles must be followed."

"In case they address to the nation of Iran with the language of respect and honor, they will receive a answer in the equivalent tone."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of repair and reconstruction, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We acquired multiple understandings from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He added: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to obliterate, continues to exist. The facilities and machinery, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the will of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to destroy. The nation of Iran have developed more powerful, more integrated, and more endorsing of the leadership and the nation in the wake of this assault."